Search for: "League v. League" Results 61 - 80 of 3,235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 12:39 pm
” Moreover, Minnesota Hockey, the state arm of the national hockey governing board, and the local district were incapable of conspiring.The May 12 decision, Minnesota Made Hockey, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 1:23 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On May 25, 2022, the League of California Cities (“League”) and California State Association of Counties (“CSAC”) filed a 10-page letter with the California Supreme Court requesting it to depublish the First District Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 4:09 pm by Howard Bashman
“Free Speech Is the Most Fundamental American Value; Why I oppose both Ivy League censorship and New York Times v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 9:31 am
Major League Baseball has argued that players should be paid when their names are used for fantasy baseball leagues. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure and others; Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08); [2011] WLR (D) 286 “The clauses of an exclusive licence agreement concluded between a holder of intellectual property rights and a broadcaster constituted a restriction on competition prohibited by article 101FEU of the FEU Treaty where they obliged the broadcaster not to supply decoding devices enabling access to… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:00 am by Peter Ling
If this story sound familiar to Kat readers, it is because similar facts were featured in a landmark CJEU decision of 2011, C-429/08 "Premier League v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:13 am
Today's order list provides: 06-589 CHRISTIAN CIVIC LEAGUE OF MAINE V. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 11:33 am
Football Association Premier League Ltd and others v QC Leisure Ltd and others (Union des Associations Europeenes de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Ltd, Setanta Sports sarl, Groupe Canal Plus SA and Motion Picture Association intervening) “The court had jurisdiction under CPR r 19.2(a) to join parties as claimants to national court proceedings in which questions had been referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities where the joinder applications were… [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
By Eric Goldman The Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. [read post]