Search for: "Leahy v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm
Both patent law and trademark law are administered by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm
Patent and Trademark Office under a 2011 federal statute, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:55 am
United States Postal Service in which the 6-3 majority held that the U.S. government doesn’t qualify as a “person” for the purposes of petitioning the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to institute patent validity proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
As Schleicher notes, Vermont has a smaller population than 28 cities in the United States (including Austin, Texas, whose metropolitan area is approximately three times the population of Vermont) and 107 counties. [read post]
2 May 2019, 4:56 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 7:27 am
District Court in the District of Columbia, and Archivist of the United States David S. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
Specifically, Gilmer v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:38 pm
(MGI), a Minnesota pharmaceutical company that markets and distributes drugs in the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 8:15 am
United States Postal Service—one of two IP cases the Court heard that week. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 1:48 pm
United States Postal Service Issue: Whether the government is a “person” who may petition to institute review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 5:56 pm
The basic question in the case is whether the United States government (here the USPS) counts as “a person who is not the owner of a patent. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 1:23 pm
United States Postal Service, which will determine if the government is able to initiate review proceedings for patents. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 7:23 am
The question in this case is whether the United States (specifically, the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:15 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has affirmed the Federal Circuits’ Decision for the Helsinn Healthcare v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 10:01 am
§ 102(b)) prohibited patenting an invention that was “on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In Pfaff v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:13 pm
Kellner On January 22, 2019, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the sale of an invention to a third party who is obligated to keep the invention confidential may place the invention “on sale” for purposes of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
