Search for: "Leathers v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 8:47 am
Leathers, 475 So.2d 1329, 1330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:48 am
VA 1-987-746 and the United States Trademark Registrations below (collectively “Harley’s Intellectual Property”). [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm
Supreme Court's ruling, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc, v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:50 am
United States, 12-8505, for that upstart non-relist Paroline v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm
United States, or credit terms in Catalano Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 8:21 am
United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
§ 109(a), must mean “lawfully made in the United States”); see generally P. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
BackgroundIn 2008, Yannick Noah, a French former tennis player, registered the following figurative sign (the Mark) as a European Union trade mark (EUTM), in respect of a number of categories of goods, including leather goods, clothing, games and playthings (the Registration): In 2019, Noah Clothing LLC, a clothing company based in the United States, filed an application with the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) seeking revocation of the… [read post]
ABA Section of Antitrust Law Spring Meeting 2016: Clarifying liability in hub-and-spoke conspiracies
4 May 2016, 10:08 am
United States. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:30 am
In this case, the United States District Court, for the Western District of Missouri, denied the plaintiff’s motion to remand finding that the CAFA’s home state controversy is not applicable when the plaintiff charged the foreign corporation as directly liable for the injuries. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:13 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:12 am
” Apple sought a petition of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court in October 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:36 pm
An adventurous soul, Sharon took numerous camping trips and road trips across the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 10:46 am
Second, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
