Search for: "Lee v. Key" Results 61 - 80 of 902
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Author
Circuit’s exacting standard of review in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:29 am by Brianna Mayes
The author would like to thank Silas Lee and Julia Won for their significant contribution to this article. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
BBC Chair, Richard Sharp resigned this week after an investigation revealed that he had failed to disclose key information about his links to former prime Minister Boris Johnson when applying for the job in 2021. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”  The report suggests these concerns may derive from three different qualities of sustainable business information and reporting: control v. influence; quantitative v. qualitative; and historical v. forward-looking. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am by John Ramming Chappell
If the Murphy-Lee resolution passes, it will mark the first time that Congress has requested a report under Section 502B(c) since 1976. [read post]
The crux of the Interim Report comprises 20 recommendations for the WFL across 4 “Key Thrusts”, which are summarised below. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:20 am by Jeff Welty
A key step in that process is the rollout of eCourts, an electronic filing and recordkeeping system. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
Media law in other jurisdictions Australia On 27 January 2023, Lee J dismissed both the proceedings, which were commenced out of time, and the applicant’s application to stay the proceedings pending the conclusion of a criminal proceedings brought against him in Landrey v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 27. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
But in this case the Second Circuit reverses because the judge did not ask questions that would determine if potential jurors held any preconcieved notions about criminal gangs.The case is United States v. [read post]