Search for: "Lege v. State"
Results 61 - 76
of 76
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2022, 5:21 am
But as the New York lege, and our default governor, have now demonstrated, the zeal to circumvent constitutional rights may take us to new depths of intrusion, such as the state approval of our words on social media, that may well be applied to the rights we do like as long as it’s being applied to the one New York doesn’t. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:22 am
The Lege won't get there simply following TDCJ's increasingly absurd recommendations.MORE: From Mike Ward, see additional details on the proposed TDCJ cuts to community supervision and diversion programs. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:31 am
State Rep. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 3:16 am
The Alabama lege made a different choice. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 3:08 am
Against this backdrop, the application of § 319b will be examined (V.). [read post]
16 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
This will now change, due to the new bail law rushed through the state lege. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
In a grave setback for the ‘Right to Information’ movement, the Delhi High Court in the case of Registrar of Companies v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:11 am
It raised another legal maxim, “Inter arma enim silent leges … In times of war, the laws fall silent. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am
Others suggest that the Lege was too busy addressing other pressing laws, so they can rush back to their districts to show how tough on crime they are. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:04 am
And from law created in 1924 in Carroll v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
De lege ferenda, a positioning of the European legislator is still desirable at this point. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
The law of a state has to be acknowledged as a cultural achievement. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
De lege lata the decision is correct. [read post]
28 Nov 2024, 5:58 am
First, against the Opposition Division's decision that the (second) intervention of 2 March 2023 (cf. point V. above) was inadmissible. [read post]
