Search for: "Lenz. Universal Music Corp." Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
(1709 Copyright Blog) (Out-Law) EU may flex regulatory muscle against Google Books deal (Ars Technica) (1709 Copyright Blog) 2009 Directive on legal protection of computer programs in force (Out-Law) European Greens want to legalise file-sharing (TorrentFreak)   Germany Federal Minister of Justice against Google Book Search (Lenz Blog)   Netherlands Mininova and BREIN clash in court to determine whether the BitTorrent indexer has to actively filter torrents from the site… [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:26 am
Universal Music Corp., 572 F.Supp.2d 1150 (ND Cal. 2008) the District Court held that the notice-giver must consider probable claims of fair use and that a failure to do so may constitute bad faith in clear cases. [read post]
13 May 2009, 8:26 am
Universal Music Corp., 572 F.Supp.2d 1150 (ND Cal. 2008) the District Court held that the notice-giver must consider probable claims of fair use and that a failure to do so may constitute bad faith in clear cases. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: USTR reveals ACTA information (Michael Geist), (Managing IP), (Michael Geist) (Outlaw.com) More insights into ACTA Wikileaks, WIPO threat etc (IPJur), (Lenz Blog), (Michael Geist), (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Michael Geist) (Michael Geist), (IP Watch) Schneider Electric v Chint patent case settled, Utility Models in… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:53 pm by Joe Markowitz
Universal Music Corp, in which the the court held that before sending a takedown notice, a copyright holder has an obligation at least to consider whether the allegedly infringing material constitutes a fair use of copyrighted material. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Patent landscape analytics may prove you wrong (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Why sinking markets could mean real opportunities for patent acquirers and licensees (IAM)   Global - Copyright Copyright still viable, at least for top authors (IP finance) Understanding the backlash cost in copying someone else's work (Techdirt)   Africa Designers from all OAPI (Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle) countries to benefit from fee reductions (Afro-IP) (WIPO) WIPO and… [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:31 am
Universal Music Corp., Judge Fogel of the United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 3:05 pm
Universal Music Corp., a federal district court in California ruled that copyright holder contemplating a takedown notice under the DMCA must consider fair use to meet its obligation to have a good faith belief that infringement has occurred. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
: (IP finance), Facebook removes international access to Scrabulous, except from India: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), Reverse engineering can resolve conflict between standardisation and competition: (Techdirt), Benefits of piracy aren’t always in the expected places: (Techdirt)   Events 1-3 September: Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Department of Industrial Property and Promotion, and WIPO conference on ‘Development and IP: Building synergies… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:25 pm
The EFF has filed a lawsuit against the Universal Music Publishing Group after the company asked that a home video be removed due to copyright infringement. [read post]