Search for: "Leone v. Leone"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
” “Here, even if the defendant had been negligent in his representation of the plaintiff in connection with the underlying matters, viewing the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), it failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendant’s alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome in the underlying matters or that the plaintiff would not have… [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 8:24 pm
Co. (204 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2022]) , citing Bentoria, AFFIRMED Supreme Court's order granting the insurer's pre-answer CPLR 3211(a)(1) motion to dismiss the complaint based on documentary evidence, holding:The documentary evidence conclusively establishes a defense to plaintiff's claims (CPLR 3211[a][1]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
At summer’s end last year, the International Law Commission (ILC) concluded the work of its 73rd session and issued its annual report to the United Nations (U.N.) [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 4:30 am
Leon (1984), establishing a good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, with 17, California v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
Following a similar interrogation in which he's threatened with the gas chamber, Leon also confesses. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 1:02 pm
The post ANTHONY LEON BROOKS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 4:39 am
Here, even accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according Mid City the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87), the complaint failed to plead specific factual allegations demonstrating that, but for the defendants’ alleged negligence, there would have been a more favorable outcome regarding the termination of Mid City’s status as a DBE (see Rudovic v Law Off. of Timothy A. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
On 22 February 2023 there was a hearing in the case of VLM v LPB (KB-2023-000117). [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
Republic of Germany v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:55 am
The Special Court for Sierra Leone was created by an agreement between the UN and Sierra Leone on 16 January 2002. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
On 10 February 2023, McLean J dismissed an appeal in the case of Safavi-Naini v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:18 am
Subsequently, in the Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The case has been assigned to Judge Richard Leon, who is free to reconsider Chief Judge Howell's order; I understand that Wren will fight the gag order, and it will be interesting to see what Judge Leon does. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:14 pm
Last month, Apple announced its new end-to-end encryption for data stored by its customers in iCloud, Apple’s cloud storage service. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 4:35 pm
United States The Supreme Court is also expected to hear two cases – Moody v NetChoice and NetChoice v Paxton – concerning the constitutionality of laws in Florida and Texas, which restrict the content moderation capabilities of social media companies. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am
ShareDuring Tuesday’s argument in Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 2:56 pm
Against this rather bleak backdrop comes the low-profile case of Santos-Zacaria v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
