Search for: "Levine v City of New York"
Results 61 - 80
of 233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2009, 1:04 pm
We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm
In Spring 2023, New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced a new policy calling for the city to relocate migrants outside of the city’s five boroughs. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
John's University School of Law and New York Law School, commented: "... [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 6:02 am
The actual statement by the Court of Appeals in McCaskey, Davies & Assoc. v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
The significance of this provision is that no pre-termination hearing that may otherwise be viewed as mandated by law such as the proceeding set out in Section 75 of the Civil Service Law or a Taylor Law disciplinary grievance procedure is required to effect the termination.In Bowman, Section 30.1(e) was the basis for the court’s sustaining the termination of several New York City correction officers without a hearing. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am
The City of New York offered to settle Dr. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
Co., 16 AD2d 564 ( 2nd Dept. 2005).After reviewing and distinguishing a number of New York cases addressing no-fault denial sufficiency and borrowing from the rationale of a 1966 New York County Supreme Court decision on service of legal papers (in which the court stated that is "does not count the papers. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
"This exception became after a New York City police officer [Police Officer] was dismissed from his position after being found guilty of misconduct based on events that occurred more than 18 months before §75 disciplinary charges had been filed against him. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
" Further, as the decision in Walton v New York State Department of Correctional Servs., 25 AD3d 999, modified, 8 NY3d at 191, notes, "an individual is not required to exhaust the available administrative remedy where such action would constitute an exercise in futility. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:30 am
The incline on the "coverage defense" slipperly slope had just gotten radically steeper.Enter Judge Katherine Levine of Richmond County New York City Civil Court, whose prodigious vocabulary and prolific writing on no-fault issues provide ample grist for this blawger's mill. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:21 pm
City of New York, 2010 WL 4678914 (November 16, 2010). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
In the ensuing appeal, the dismissal was affirmed (Cagino v Levine, 199 AD3d 1103. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
In the ensuing appeal, the dismissal was affirmed (Cagino v Levine, 199 AD3d 1103. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:05 pm
Judge Levine found that the police accident report, although identifying the license plate of the vehicle the assignor was driving as having been authorized by the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, was not sufficient by itself "to raise a complicated factual question on employment so as to warrant the intercession of the Workers Compensation Board. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:13 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900 (2nd Dept 1979), affirmed 49 NY2d 747 (1980). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
An Interracial Movement of the Poor: Community Organizing and the New Left in the 1960s (New York University Press, 2001).Gendron, Richard and G. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am
Here is a variant: “The plaintiff, who held a master plumber license from the New York City Department of Buildings (hereinafter the DOB), retained the defendants to represent her with respect to disciplinary charges brought against her by the DOB. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:17 am
"An action dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 may be restored only if the plaintiff can demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default in complying with the 90-day notice and a meritorious cause of action (see Picot v City of New York, 50 AD3d 757; Sapir v Krause, Inc., 8 AD3d 356, 356-357; Lopez v Imperial Delivery Serv., 282 AD2d 190, 197). [read post]
