Search for: "Lewis v. Gross" Results 61 - 80 of 139
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2021, 8:41 am by Andrew Mahtook and William Bennett
The Act also contains one broad exemption which applies to companies that 1) employ more than 20 people; 2) filed a tax return reporting gross receipts in excess of $5 million; and 3) have a physical presence in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-8134; Lewis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:35 am
Justice Powell suggested just that in his concurrence in Lewis v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On 17 May 2018, the Court of Appeal (Gross, Macfarlane and Coulson LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of TLT v Home Office. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
TheCTA exempts twenty-four kinds of entities from its reporting requirements,including banks, insurance companies, and entities with more than twentyemployees, five million dollars in gross revenue, and a physical office in the UnitedStates. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:00 am
Lewis Carroll, the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland 16. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
Speaking at Iona College in New York Tuesday, Justice Antonin Scalia said critics of the Bush v. [read post]