Search for: "Lillie Love"
Results 61 - 80
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Tune in LIVE for tomorrow's Eli Lilly v Actavis Supreme Court showdownThe Supreme Court was live online to hear Tom Mitcheson QC (supported by Andrew Waugh QC and leading Stuart Baran) for Eli Lilly against Danny Alexander QC (leading Thomas Raphael QC) for Actavis.Oldie but goldie - when is old prior art a suitable starting point for inventive step analysis? [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
If you or a loved one has suffered injuries due to the careless or reckless conduct of another party, they can be held legally responsible for the resulting harm. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:38 am
If you or a loved one has suffered injuries due to the careless or reckless conduct of another party, they can be held legally responsible for the resulting harm. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 10:37 am
If you or a loved one has taken the drug Onglyza and have experienced heart failure, you may be entitled to compensation for your pain, suffering and medical costs. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:46 pm
To ease the pain over the years, I removed myself from those I love back home. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
Love can be learned. 61. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:21 am
Individuals such as former Takata engineer Mark Lillie have come forward to say that they warned Takata more than 15 years ago that the defect would cause deaths. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Emma recounts the state of confusion of copyright in Trinidad’s Carnival industry also via a lovely song of this year’s popular Carnival tunes, which she amended for the Kat-readership's pleasure. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Last week’s “breaking news” post on West Virginia’s statutory restoration of the learned intermediary rule started us thinking about how every state now has pro-learned intermediary precedent. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
Mr Justice Arnold handed down his decision in the latest Eli Lilly and Actavis battle concerning lung cancer treatment pemetrexed disodium, in Actavis v Lilly [2016] EWHC 234, and Annsley takes the floor to recount this romantic, patent story,**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 82 [week ending on Sunday 7 January] – PhD Student Seminar at CIPA | IP meets Antimonopoly law in Japan | German Federal Patent Court… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:25 am
He also wrote for the Court in Eli Lilly v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:53 am
Eric Meyer has a good (and entertaining) post: Those EEO-1s you love to complete are gonna get more complicatedThat should keep you busy for awhile. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 am
Found out in this lovely post by Annsley! [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 10:21 am
Larry Welch (Eli Lilly)Larry Welch from Eli Lilly concluded the presentation by outlining the position under US law which is simple - there is no requirement to remunerate inventors under US law. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
As we learned from the high profile Lilly Ledbetter case (discussed here and here), the difficulty employees face in learning that pay discrimination has occurred allows it to go unchecked. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
” To be sure, in the wake of Ginsburg’s 2007 dissent in the Ledbetter case, a later Congress did pass the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:21 pm
On the afternoon of Sunday, August 30, 2015 officers from the Elk Grove Police Department arrested a man who allegedly hit three cars parked along Shasta Lilly Drive in the City of Elk Grove. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
And who could tell this story better than our own lovely Merpel? [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
