Search for: "List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED January 15, 2013."
Results 61 - 66
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
James case (No. 6 below), the California Supreme Court ordered republished the decision of the Fourth Appellate District [167 Cal.App.4th 800, 84 Cal.Rptr.3d 464 (2008)], awarding the property to the plaintiff Diocese of San Diego; the defendants did not seek further review)6-8. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has recently denied Jenzabar’s petition for further appellate review of this case -- another welcome victory for Long Bow, but we will likely need to pursue the deeper issues in another forum. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts has recently denied Jenzabar’s petition for further appellate review of this case -- another welcome victory for Long Bow, but we will likely need to pursue the deeper issues in another forum. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The fee for petitions for review is to be reimbursed when the proceedings are re-opened before the BoA, even if further requests filed with the petition for review (here: replacement of members of the BoA) are unsuccessful, i.e. even if the requests of the petitioner are only partly successful. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 9:38 pm
IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE January 25, 2013 Mr. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
Any petition for review shall be filed within 60 days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 307 of the Act. [read post]
