Search for: "Little v. Cooke" Results 61 - 80 of 1,249
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
Texas, was decided just two weeks prior to Brown, but there is another little-known case that was instrumental for the American civil rights movement:  Méndez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by Chris Attig
  In today’s episode, I’m going to give you a quick introduction to the case of Cook v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 4:25 am by Chris Attig
  In today’s episode, I’m going to give you a quick introduction to the case of Cook v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 4:59 am
Roller Coaster Ride for Software WriterThe IPKat stumbled across Sawyer v Atari Interactive Inc, a Chancery Division decision of Mr Justice Cooke from 19 October, on the LexisNexis Butterworths subscription service.Sawyer wrote computer games which Atari developed and distributed. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:56 am
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department, Law Division, No. 02 L 004839. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 8:37 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Cook County Jury Verdict for Bicycle Rider Hit by Turning Car; Harvey v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 11:12 am
As a Chicago television station reported a little over a month ago, for two years the Cook County Sheriff's office has been targeting the use of Craigslist to facilitate prostitution.According to the story, prostitutes advertise in the "erotic services" section of Craigslist. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:25 am by Howard Friedman
The court allowed him to proceed on certain unrelated claims.In Little v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:51 pm
The PD's office complies, resulting in about 50 assistant public defenders being laid off.A little something called Gideon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
The following is a little piece by the IPKat's valued friend and colleague, European patent attorney Kevin Cordina (Olswang LLP), who writes: "In Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Incorporated a US priority application was filed in the name of three inventors, with the rights from one of those inventors passing to Cook. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
That's what happened in Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 4:24 am by John L. Welch
Cook's assertion of no actual confusion despite contemporaneous use of the marks for more than 18 years was entitled to little weight in this ex parte context, where the registrant has no opportunity to be heard. [read post]