Search for: "Little v. Jacobs" Results 61 - 80 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Don’t Ground ‘Uber in the Sky'” [Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer on Cato Institute brief in FAA v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 12:36 pm
But there are some serious potential downsides of having a high-profile criminal defense attorney as a partner -- even a non-equity partner -- of the firm as well.As Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & Shapiro learned in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
There is little to report: the summary of the law given in Virgin Atlantic v Premium Aircraft Interiors [2009] EWCA Civ 1062, [2010] RPC 8 was applied and the relevant phrases found within the claims were construed in light of the specification and drawings. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by South Florida Lawyers
The complaint alleges, without elaboration, that “[v]isco-elastic foam mattresses comprise a relevant product market, or submarket, separate and distinct from the market for mattresses generally, under the federal antitrust laws. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Indiana oral argument, Court seems sympathetic to idea of applying Excessive Fines clause to the states [Robby Soave, Jacob Sullum, Ilya Somin, earlier here, here, and here] Notwithstanding Justice Gorsuch and Kavanaugh’s interjections, there is and has been no uniform incorporation of the entire Bill of Rights against the states [Rory Little] Arizona Supreme Court should recognize that First Amendment protects right of calligraphic art studio not to be forced to draw… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am by Chuck Ramsay
  There is little down side -- a minimal contribution from each lawyer and a delay necessitated by the review. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 1:53 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff loses the case, demonstrating how hard it is for them to win such retaliation cases.The case is Morrow v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
As Darren explains, the Supreme Court of the USA has just weighed in on the same matter in the case of Teva v Sandoz.* Exodus 2.0: pirate sites and the seven seasJeremy gives the floor to Míchel Olmedo Cuevas, who seizes the moment when a brand-new Hollywood colossal is being launched to explain the brand-new enforcement measures that the recent Spanish reform provides to battle online copyright infringement.* Softly, softly: General Court no-hopes Pianissimo… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:21 am
That's what happened in Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Inc. [read post]
21 May 2009, 12:00 am
But we know little more than that. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 3:17 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Assuming the employees even know the CBA says this, they probably give it little thought until they decide to file a discrimination lawsuit against the employer. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
From one of our dearest and most kat-patted friends, the excellent Chris Torrero, comes a link to "Colleges Need Free Speech More Than Trademarks", a fascinating little article by Jacob H. [read post]