Search for: "Lloyd v. Miller" Results 61 - 80 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Rulings IPSO has published three rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 03356-18 Temerko v The Sunday Times, resolved via IPSO mediation Resolution Statement 20876-17 Johnson v Mail Online, resolved via IPSO mediation 01053-18 Miller v The Scottish Sun, no breach after investigation 02615-18 Thurrock Council v Thurrock Independent, no breach of provision 1 (accuracy) after investigation 02821-18 Sivier v Mail Online, no… [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 3 March 2017 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Lloyd-Jones and McCombe LJJ) gave judgment in the important data protection case of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Lloyd Rayney’s brother-in-law has testified that he still believes that Rayney killed his wife Corryn. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
It launched Lloyd’s new Reuters Institute publication “Scandal! [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by INFORRM
Research and Resources Tom Heron, “The ‘Safari workaround’ and the future of UK Data Protection: Disenfranchisement of Data Subjects in Lloyd v Google LLC” The Eagle, the Trinity College Law Gazette. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Bindel v PinkNews Media Group Ltd, heard 26 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon, heard 21-23 and 26 April 2021 (Nicklin J) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and  25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P,  Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard  22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack,&nb [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The decision in R (Miller) v (1) The College of Policing, and (2) The Chief Constable of Humberside [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) tackles police recording, retention and dissemination of information about individuals in relation to “non-crime” hate  incidents. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statement since our last Round Up: 04322-21 Ruayrungruang v The Sunday Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 04302-21 Lovatt v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 03315-21 Ruayrungruang v The Daily Telegraph, 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 00798-21 Reynolds v The Daily Telegraph, 1… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
State Farm Lloyds, 202 S.W.3d 744 (Tex. 2006).Chinese Drywall: CHINESE DRYWALL-RELATED LOSS NOT AN 'ACCIDENT' FOR COVERAGE PURPOSES, Lopez v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Next Week  in the Courts On 26 July 2021, Nicklin J will hear applications in the cases of BHX v GRX and BHX v Victim Support. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The Court in Fourco relied heavily on its 1942 decision, Stonite Products Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 18 June 2021 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The Mischon de Reya website has a post about the CJEU decision in WS v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
On 5 October 2021, Nicklin J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the case of Vine v Belfield. [read post]