Search for: "Long v. Fanning et al"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2009, 10:22 am
See page 3, Harjo, Suzan S., et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
Shout outs to the folks from Thomson Reuters, Dorsey & Whitney, Merrill, Kroll, Socha/Gelbmann, Jersey Girl, Laverne & Linda, et al! [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 7:01 am
In one, DH et al v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:12 am
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, et al. (08-861) Black, et al. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 8:28 pm
Weems, et al., the two Boston Massacre Trials of Captain Thomas Preston and eight other British redcoats - for the paltry sum of eighteen guineas, future-president-to-be John Adams, then a 34-year old lawyer in Boston, took on the unpopular defense of these almost surely-to-be-hung soldiers. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
In a study of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks from 1982-2002, the authors estimated that half of the produce-associated outbreaks were due to produce already contaminated with E. coli O157 before purchase by the retail store or consumer (Rangel et al, 2005). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
As a practical matter, I can assure all graphic novel fans that no one wants to stop or even delay this movie. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:54 am
The theory of civil liability is that Duke is liable for the harm caused by this expression because Brodhead, et al., failed to stop these faculty members and students from engaging in this expression. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 11:28 am
Anyway, DoTD points to Wallace v. [read post]
