Search for: "Long v. Foley"
Results 61 - 80
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2007, 5:42 pm
I think this period, which the field survived (some would say, just barely), casts a long shadow over today’s developments. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:13 am
In this case, Foley Hoag LLP submitted an amicus brief on behalf of long-time pro bono clients the Victim Rights Law Center (VRLC) and Jane Doe, Inc. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:06 am
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:33 am
Solutions LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
In Bucklew v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:29 pm
Today’s long-anticipated ruling has its genesis in the 2011 opinion AT&T Mobility Servs. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:00 am
advisers who advise solely “qualifying private funds” (as defined below) as long as the collective private fund assets are less than $150 million. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm
New York Federal Court Denies Early Summary Judgment Motion as to Exempt Status of Financial Analyst - Long Island attorney Noel Tripp of Jackson Lewis on the firm's blog, the Wage & Hour Law Update Detail and Timing of Notice to Officer under Investigation - California lawyer Debra Reilly on her blog, Workplace Investigations Lidle v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:46 pm
Foley, P.A. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:37 pm
Pileggi of Fox Rothschild in his Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog Krupski v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
Media law news this week was dominated by the Tulisa privacy injunction and the long-awaited judgment in Flood v Times Newspapers. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
Davis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 4:17 pm
From Chehade v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 7:05 am
Super. 1987) (same); Foley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Foley Hoag Blog-Proud Very Blog-Proud in fact. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
” I also have concerns about the instability of the compact – partly for the reasons Foley and Levinson spell out and also for a somewhat different reason: even if the NPVIC were to clear all of the political and constitutional hurdles and actually become law, there is little reason to believe that it would remain in force permanently – or even for very long. [read post]
