Search for: "Long v. US Dept. of Justice"
Results 61 - 80
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Government Justice Center, Inc., Albany (Cameron J. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
Government Justice Center, Inc., Albany (Cameron J. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:59 pm
Co. of Connecticut, 2003 WL 329054 (SDNY Feb. 13, 2003).The policyholder in Phillips did not appeal Justice Siwek’s corresponding order.Matter of Pottenburgh v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Joel M. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am
Fourth, “[t]o be entitled to an equitable accounting, a claimant must demonstrate that he or she has no adequate remedy at law” (Unitel Telecard Distribution Corp. v Nunez, 90 AD 3d 568 [1st Dept 2011]). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
It makes good use of Justice Scalia's majority opinion in Castle Rock v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:59 am
Alderman v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:44 am
” The Appellate Division affirmed in all respects in Quattro Parent LLC v Rakib, 181 AD3d 518 [1st Dept 2020]. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
National Archives Asks Justice Dept. to Investigate Trump’s Handling of White House Records MSN – Matt Zapotosky, Jacqueline Alemany, Ashley Parker, and Josh Dawsey (Washington Post) | Published: 2/9/2022 The National Archives and Records Administration asked the Justice Department to examine Donald Trump’s handling of White House records. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:01 am
["]'Hit and run' journalism is no more protected under the First Amendment, than speeding on a crowded sidewalk is permitted under a valid driver's license" (Greenberg v CBS Inc., 69 AD2d 693, 700 (2d Dept 1979]). [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The Justice Dept. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
At the core of these principles is an important new one, though one that waits for greater elaboration elsewhere--the need for reasoned decision making subject to broad review by the courts (e.g., Dept of Commerce v, NY, No. 18–966. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 9:38 am
["]'Hit and run' journalism is no more protected under the First Amendment, than speeding on a crowded sidewalk is permitted under a valid driver's license" (Greenberg v CBS Inc., 69 AD2d 693, 700 (2d Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 4:37 am
And these provisions often make good business sense: they ensure that a corporation has a mechanism to prevent a shareholder from using the specter of a deadlock or oppression-based dissolution proceeding to compel a high buyout price (see In re Doniger, 122 AD2d 873 [2d Dept 1986]; Matter of Johnsen, 31 AD3d 172 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
6 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
Co. v. [read post]
