Search for: "Longe v. Department of Employment SEC." Results 61 - 80 of 183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
” On page 13, in a long footnote (number 7), the majority says that the FMR companies “are not acting as agents for employment purposes of the Fidelity mutual funds, which are public companies but have no employees. [read post]
22 May 2014, 5:00 am
Sec’y of HEW, 628 F.2d 748 (1st Cir. 1980), in which a private product liability litigation plaintiff sought documents and the depositions of three current employees of FDA (then part of the Department of Health, Education & Welfare). [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 11:02 am by Ryan Snyder
Department of Education, which decided a question of personal jurisdiction under District of Columbia law, and NextEra Energy Global Holdings B.V. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 6:29 am by Neil Hamilton and Louis Bilionis
Bar Ass’n Sec. of Legal Educ. and Admissions to the Bar, Report to the House of Delegates at 4 (adopted Feb. 14, 2022). [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 To be sure, the EB-5 program would benefit from greater regulatory clarity and closer liaison with the SEC and Commerce Department as the OIG proposed. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the court held that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” who have to be appointed by the president, a court or a department head, which Williams calls “a step in the process of unraveling the administrative state. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 12:54 am by Frank Cranmer
In Department of Fair Employment and Housing v Cathy’s Creations Inc (CA Super Ct Oct 21, 2022) the court concluded that the Department had failed to prove intentional sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court declined to rule on the merits in Zubik v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
Both had previous experience and were, at the time, two of the oldest men in the department. [read post]