Search for: "Los Angeles Unified School District v. S"
Results 61 - 80
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
Code, §§ 97.2, 97.3; see Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
XVI, § 8; see Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
(Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 11:14 am
In Los Angeles Unified School District v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
Maybe the Los Angeles Unified School District. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
City of Oakland); and the Supreme Court’s recognition of common sense as a tool in CEQA administration (Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
XVI, § 8; see Los Angeles Unified School Dist. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:00 pm
Los Angeles Unified School District (2009) 176 Cal.App. 4th 889; South Orange County Wastewater Authority v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Los Angeles Unified School District (2009) 176 CalApp.4th 889, both which held that CEQA is intended to identify effects of the proposed project, not the effects of the existing environment on that project. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The CRA/CLC analogized the Legislature's actions to street crime, stating that the State believed "that Proposition 22 is like a hypothetical robbery statute that prohibits the theft of someone's money unless the victim is killed first. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
The CRA/CLC analogized the Legislature's actions to street crime, stating that the State believed "that Proposition 22 is like a hypothetical robbery statute that prohibits the theft of someone's money unless the victim is killed first. [read post]
Lead Agencies Are Not Always Required to Explain Why Every Proposed Mitigation Measure is Infeasible
15 Aug 2011, 10:47 am
Citing to Los Angeles Unified School District v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Unified School Dist., 2 Cal.3d 741, 87 Cal.Rptr. 376, 470 P.2d 360 (1970) (finding that ‘roughhousing’ and ‘horseplay’ are normal activities for high school boys and thus it is a function of proper supervision to control such behavior). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Los Angeles Unified School District (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 436, Ms. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:00 am
Los Angeles Unified School District (filed March 8, 2011) 2011 DJDAR 3609 was a tenured carpenter employed by the school district when he was terminated for insubordination, ethics violations and appearing for work while under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Los Angeles Unified School Dist., 2 Cal.3d 741, 87 Cal.Rptr. 376, 470 P.2d 360 (1970) (finding that ‘roughhousing’ and ‘horseplay’ are normal activities for high school boys and thus it is a function of proper supervision to control such behavior). [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:48 pm
San Francisco Unified School District v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 5:12 am
A lawsuit was filed in federal district court in Los Angeles last week on behalf of a 5th-grade student challenging Superior Street Elementary School's school's policy of barring acts with religious messages from the school's annual talent show sponsored by the PTA. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 11:33 pm
Los Angeles Community College Dist. 9th Cir. 1988)] factors demonstrates that the school district in this case is a state agency for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Violations were also discovered at companies in Los Angeles, Sun Valley, Compton, Van Nuys and Santa Clara. [read post]
