Search for: "Louisiana Executive Branch" Results 61 - 80 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 6:30 am by Karen Tani
Indeed, I would suggest, no one should work in the White House or executive branch—or seek to critique what they do—unless they have first read this book and taken its lessons to heart. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:15 pm by Steve Hall
  The reading will be at the Carver Branch Library (1611 Angelina, just one mile east of the Texas Capitol) at 2:00 pm. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:41 am
In the ruling, the judge stated that Congress had not granted the Department of Homeland Security or the executive branch the authority to create the DACA program. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm by Eugene Volokh
Does the Government think that the First Amendment allows Executive Branch officials to engage in such conduct? [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Philip Thomas
Failure to do so is a failure in leadership by the executive and legislative branches. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Shalini Bhargava Ray
When the executive branch fails to set priorities on immigration enforcement, the pitfalls are evident. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:02 am by Bill Raftery
Texas House Select Committee on State Sovereignty advances its own version of a sharia/international law ban that differs from the House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence version Louisiana House urges and requests state’s Supreme Court implement mandatory continuing education for judges Ohio may consolidate references to all court costs and fees in a single statute/code section California bill would require Judicial Council get approval from two-thirds of trial… [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
My research revealed that nineteen state protocols give officials overseeing the execution discretion to inject additional doses as they see fit.Some death penalty states (including Arizona, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and South Dakota) do not even bother to mandate a particular drug cocktail. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:01 pm
The big problem here is not that the President's "last word" within the Executive branch was so unorthodox, but that it was so unorthodox and secret, and thus so unchecked, i.e., that the final word within the Executive branch became, for all intents and purposes, the final, unreviewable policy and practice of the United States, whether it be with respect to surveillance in violation of FISA, or with respect to "enhanced" interrogation… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:20 am
Louisiana, Justice Alito poses the following pair of hypothetical examples in his dissent:With respect to the question of moral depravity, is it really true that every person who is convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death is more morally depraved than every child rapist? [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:35 am
But those risks are lower if the executive and legislative branches must follow judicial decisions on constitutional issues, than if they don’t. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
While an undergrad, Seth acted as Executive Editor of the McNeese State University newspaper, The Contraband. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:24 am by Benjamin Wittes
The Founders themselves struggled with the problems of creating a government—and an executive branch within that government—with power adequate to protect security yet with power bounded in such fashion as not to menace the liberty of people or the sovereignty of states that made up the union. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The states of Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Carolina, and West Virginia have joined the Texas lawsuit. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
While this statement is generally true for and applicable to both the executive and legislation branches, as sagely summarized by Justice Moore over fifty years ago, it can not be said to apply nearly as much to the judiciary. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
A few federal district courts in South Carolina have taken a narrower view: The South Carolina statute's protection of "political opinions" and "political rights and privileges guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution," they have held, is limited to "matters directly related to the executive, legislative, and administrative branches of Government, such as political party affiliation, political campaign contributions, and the right to vote. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:38 pm by David S. Jones
The rule clarifies that DHS is the Executive Branch department charged with making determinations regarding eligibility for H-2B classification and that it consults with DOL about matters with which DOL has expertise, such as the methodology for setting the H-2B prevailing wage. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
Unfortunately, American history is replete with examples of the high price innocent individuals have paid for executive branch excess, aided by an acquiescent Congress and docile Supreme Court. [read post]