Search for: "Love v. Keith" Results 61 - 80 of 116
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2012, 6:27 am by Dave
I love Keith Exford's comment: "To make sweeping generalizations about four million people is pretty uncalled for". [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
v=wshlnRWnf30) It was the second major victory of ignorance over science. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
The seventh in the series of articles for IP Finance by Keith Mallinson (WiseHarbor) argues powerfully in favour of IP protection for software patent here. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 2:43 pm
In contrast the players in Nokia v IPCom are real -- and here we are talking of corporate decision-makers, investors and shareholders -- and their interests are real too. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
But I’d love to hear what readers might think. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:45 am by Mandelman
Chris Mathews and Keith Olbermann are clearly there to compete with Hannity and O’Reilly, and they’re doing so at least somewhat effectively, as I understand it. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm by Mark Bennett
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
(Michael Geist)   Global – Copyright Three strikes, exile, and Judge Dredd (Public Knowledge) Jon Newton shuts down P2PNet (Excess Copyright) Keith Urban gets all confused about support for downloading (TorrentFreak) Avatar DVD screener leaks to BitTorrent (TorrentFreak) Techno diva loves BitTorrent, hates Spotify (TorrentFreak)   Global - Trade Marks & Domain Names The mother of UDRP complaints? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
Justice Alito then turned to the famous case of Ricci v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 5:30 am
   Race-based restrictions on marriage have been illegal for, oh, 42 years now, since the Supreme Court's decision in Loving v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
Another of those rules, premised on the Equal Protection Clause, was set forth in the aptly named Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]