Search for: "Lowe v. Clayton" Results 61 - 80 of 120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Clayton County, the Court’s recent decision holding that the federal law prohibiting employment discrimination applies to gay, lesbian, and transgender employees. [read post]
The letter to the DOJ expressed concern over the concentration of meat packers in the cattle industry as well as the difference between the low live cattle price and the healthy price of beef products. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am by Brett Holubeck
Unemployment is still low and there are more job openings than there are people that can fill them. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
  The antitrust agencies have challenged consummated deals valued as low as $3 million (see George’s/Tysons,  Complaint, United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am by Carolina Attorneys
” Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Co., Inc., 286 N.C. 215, 219, 210 S.E.2d 199, 202 (1974). [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
International Health Law Michele Forzley, Forzley & Associates, Health Sector Transition in Low Middle Income Countries: the Role of Law Renee Landers, Suffolk University Law School, Social Security Totalization Agreements in a Global Economy Rob Leflar, University of Arkansas School of Law, The Failings of Japanese Patient Safety Reforms in an International Context Oliver Quick, University of Bristol, Will The English Legal Duty of Candour Work? [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
This has been established law since the decision in Clayton v Clayton [2006] EWCA Civ 878; [2007] 1 FLR. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am by John Elwood
Clayton County, Georgia, 17-1618, and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]