Search for: "Lucasfilm Ltd. " Results 61 - 80 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2008, 10:57 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Laku, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1745 (16 July 2008) Wilson, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1754 (15 July 2008) Sivaraman, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1736 (24 July 2008) Islam, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 1740 (31 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Perry & Anor v Harris (A Minor) [2008] EWCA Civ 907 (31 July 2008) Jirehouse Capital & Anor v Beller & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 908 (30 July 2008) Secretary of State for the Environment Food & Rural Affairs v… [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 11:53 am
Lack of assessment of features 'commonplace' in current papercut works DJ Clarke outlined the correct approach to be used in comparing artistic works, as that of Lord Hoffman in Designers Guild Ltd v Russell Williams (Textile) Ltd. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:54 am
There is no formal definition of works of artistic craftsmanship, but the published guidance has produced suggestions (pg 7) as to how the courts will approach this type of work based on the cases of Hensher (George) Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd[1975] RPC 31, HL and Lucasfilm Limited and others v Ainsworth and another [2012] 1 AC 208:• It is not enough for a work (such as a piece of furniture) to look attractive to qualify as a work of artistic… [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 12:18 am by Apeng
 (The SPC Blog) (EPLAW) Modafinil – UK: EWHC: Constructing a case for infringing particle-size patents: Cephalon Inc, Cephalon France SAS and Cephalon (UK) Ltd v Orchid Europe Ltd and Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) / ???? [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Shepperton Design Studios Ltd; 2006 Mealey’s CA Jury Verdicts & Settlements 1167 Lucasfilm, Ltd. and Lucas Licensing, Ltd. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
No - regardless of how it's displayedThe second was Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor [2011] UKSC 39  (the "Star Wars case" covered on the IPKat here) concerned the question of whether a stormtroopers' helmet met the definition of a sculpture under the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Before you root, root, root for the Ravens in Superbowl XLVII; before you go pick up with that 100-piece platter of buffalo wings; before you even crack open a single cold one, you owe it to yourself to read this week's super-sized Inbox: A California appellate court reversed a trial court verdict for Julie Gilman Veronese, which had awarded her $1.3 million in damages against her former employer, Lucasfilm Ltd., which had terminated Ms. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Gareth
  The UK Court of Appeal has recently held that the online sale of goods into a territory is insufficient to provide that territory’s courts with personal jurisdiction (see Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 7:27 am
" Lucasfilm Ltd., Star Wars creator George Lucas's entertainment company that runs the site, said the language is standard in Hollywood. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
As all the fine Private International Law practitioners reading this post will know, forum non conveniens requires the Court’s consideration of the test set out by Lord Goff of Chieveley in Spiliada Maritime Corp v Cansulex Ltd [1987] AC 460. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://duncanbucknell.com/subscribe/   Highlights this week included: Star Wars producer Lucasfilm fails to win damages over unauthorised replicas of stormtrooper helmets - EWCA decision in Lucasfilm Ltd & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) (IPKat) (1709 Copyright Blog) (Trademark Blog) (Class 99) USPTO releases patent pendency simulation tool -… [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
Lucasfilm Limited & Ors v Ainsworth & Anor, heard 7 – 9 March 2011. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 8:09 am
This, together with other issues, is what Arnold J had been asked to determine in Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC & Anor v WPMC Ltd & Anor [2015] EWHC 1853 (Ch) (01 July 2015), an intriguing case decided earlier this week, having to do with the Beatles and a documentary concerning their first US concert ever. [read post]