Search for: "Lurk v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Monte Mills
In 1823, Chief Justice John Marshall concluded in Johnson v. [read post]
 Hurley, Texas (shorthand for the state challengers), and the Solicitor General (or “SG” for the intervening United States) argue that the insurance requirement cannot be severed and thus the entire ACA must fall. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am by Anne Joseph O'Connell
In a memorandum from Mitnick to Nielsen, Mitnick wrote: “Pursuant to your authority set forth in section 113 of title 6, United States Code, you have expressed your desire to designate certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm by Ben Berwick, Rachel Homer
” Instead, the Framers drafted a Constitution that required the Senate’s “Advice and Consent” for the appointment of “Officers of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
At that time, there were only 43 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the United States and six deaths. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:26 pm by Dan Flynn
But with little niceties in the Constitution about rights to a speedy trial and all those discovery deadlines, it is going to be interesting to see just how the United States v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:04 pm by Guest Contributor
  The influence of the meat industry has been lurking, invited into our homes and waiting for us at our favorite restaurants. [read post]
And as much as the media spins that as the frightening prospect of asymptomatic carriers lurking among us, it means that COVID-19 is not a threat of serious illness or death for a lot of people. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 6:30 am by Stephen Griffin
”  And again, “there is no proof that it is any kind of serious problem in the United States. [read post]