Search for: "M/V Coal Express" Results 61 - 80 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– Larry O’Dell, CBS2 Chicago, July 26, 2010 A federal appeals court on Monday reversed a judge’s ruling requiring prompt installation of upgraded emission controls at three coal-fired power plants in Tennessee and one in Alabama. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  I’m sure as well that I’ll have updates to this analysis as I have the chance to reflect on it. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm by Shannon Sims
UT Law Spring 2010 coastal courses: Climate Change Law & PolicyClass Unique #: 28633 Course #: 179M Instructor: Benjamin/Gholz Credits: 1Wednesday 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm Friday 1:30 pm - 4:30 pm Exam type: Early CLASS MEETS JANUARY 20-FEBRUARY 5.What the course is about. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 5:36 am
Indeed, Judge Hand admonishes: 'To argue that the promisee is responsible for failing independently to confirm [the warranty], is utterly to misconceive its office.' Metropolitan Coal Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am by velvel
June 11, 2009Re: Irving Picard’s Three Percent Commission In The Madoff Case. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
More specifically, the ADAA rejects the holdings by the United States Supreme Court in Sutton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 3:48 am
And if one lump of coal wasn’t enough for Plough’s stocking, the 11th District added another a week later, in State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
Code § § 8-1-8.8 violate the Commerce Clause because the statutes express a preference for Indiana coal. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 4:18 pm
Namely, the court will attempt to determine the parties' intent when entering a contract from their expressions within the four corners of the written instrument. [read post]