Search for: "M and C Hotel Interests Inc"
Results 61 - 70
of 70
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2009, 2:06 am
Mendelson and Linda M. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian Trade… [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its… [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 2:19 pm
The Board, applying Section 102.111(c) of the Board's Rules whereby a document may be filed late "only upon good cause shown based on excusable neglect," rejected the response as untimely filed. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 8:19 am
Scott C. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IP Dragon),Chinese hotel liable for sales by shop: (IPKat)DenmarkGovernment report on counterfeiting and piracy: (Class 46)EuropeDSS case shows why EU leaders want one patent jurisdiction, but will patent owners? [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
DTR Industries, Inc [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 8:23 am
§ 510(c). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
Accor Economy Lodging, Inc. and Motel 6, 347 F.3d 672 (7th Cir. 2003), where the Court upheld a compensatory award of $5000 against a wealthy corporate hotel chain ownership ($1.6 billion net worth) for not having fumigated a hotel known to have bedbugs - which had bitten the plaintiffs - and further upheld an additional award of $186,000 (!) [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
