Search for: "M and L Publishing Company, Inc." Results 61 - 80 of 470
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
Parliamentary privilege did not apply in this instance as Bryant later quoted from his speech in a letter to the Foreign Secretary which was published on Twitter. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The HawkTalk blog has published an analysis of the “Lobby Pack” that accompanied the Queen’s Speech, which describes important elements of the proposed Parliamentary legislative programme. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
An entity—a landlord, a manufacturer, a phone company, a credit card company, an Internet platform, a self-driving car manufacturer—is making money off its customers' activities. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:41 am by Emma Snell
María Paúl reports for the Washington Post. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Vertafore, Inc., No. 21-20404 (5th Cir., March 11, 2022), in which the defendant stored over 27 million Texas driver’s license records on an external unencrypted server. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 5:47 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, January 28, 2022 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of January 21–27, 2022. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
Pix Credit HEREThe legal and academic community spent the better part of 4 years under the Trump administration refining the jurisprudence of administrative law and regulation. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Legalign Global client alert. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
I would like to thank Barry and Michael for allowing me to publish their article as a guest post on this site. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 11:32 am by Eric Goldman
” The court continues: The Supreme Court’s holdings in Tornillo, Hurley, and PG&E, stand for the general proposition that private companies that use editorial judgment to choose whether to publish content—and, if they do publish content, use editorial judgment to choose what they want to publish—cannot be compelled by the government to publish other content. [read post]