Search for: "M. & M. TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The basis of the Direction was that the claimant bank “continued to engage in a pattern of conduct which supported and facilitated Iran’s proliferation-sensitive activities, that nuclear-related companies received funds from M, and that a company with alleged connections with other nuclear-related companies conducted business using Bank Mellat”. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
M/V Ya Mawlaya, 99 F.3d 717, 722 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm by Zoe Stern
Patnaik and Kennedy proposed that the United States adopt either a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system requiring companies to purchase a permit for each ton of carbon they emit. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
<> House Hearing On Issues Facing Civilian and Postal Service Vehicle Fleet Procurement - Witness Testimony and webcast <> FEMP Seeking Public Comment on Draft M&V Guidelines - The measurement and verification (M&V) document provides guidelines for measuring and verifying energy, water, and cost savings associated with federal energy savings performance… [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
 For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
The asymmetries run beyond the usual problem of state subsidies to that of states being tempted to tilt markets in favor of SOEs (producing a sort of systemic corruption in markets driven systems) to issues of interference with sovereignty when SOEs serve as the apex enterprise in global production chains.[18] The legal status of SOEs varies from being a part of government to stock companies with a state as a regular stockholder.[19] But its purpose has remained… [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 1:41 pm by Florian Mueller
Motorola abandoned that position in the course of litigation, but a demand letter taking that insane position had entered the public record before.In response to my call for input, only a few other examples have been reported to me, and they confirm that it's basically just patent trolls and companies who for whatever reason behave like trolls:The other such case I previously reported on is In re Innovatio: Innovatio "sued numerous coffee shops, hotels, restaurants, supermarkets,… [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Without H.B. 20, which would outlaw such censorship, the EU may end up determining what gets said on social media worldwide, including in the United States. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]