Search for: "MARRIAGE OF LAWRENCE" Results 61 - 80 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2022, 7:48 am by Howard Bashman
“Same-sex marriage and LGBTQ protections at center of another Supreme Court case; Justices will consider whether owners of certain creative businesses have a free speech right to refuse to undertake certain projects if they disagree with the message”: Lawrence Hurley of NBC News has this report. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:45 am by Guest Blogger
Wade and the 10th of the ruling in Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 2:08 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
The plaintiffs in this case also contended that “doctrinal developments” from Supreme Court decisions, such as Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 12:41 pm by Andrew Koppelman
  Richard Lawrence Miller, Nazi Justiz: Law of the Holocaust 149 (1995). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by David S. Kemp
Justice Kennedy also authored the majority opinion in the seminal 2003 case Lawrence v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm by Mark Tushnet
When he asked at the oral arguments in the marriage-equality cases exactly when did the Constitution make marriage equality mandatory, I thought the right answer was, "Why, on June 26, 2003, when you said in your dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 4:34 pm
Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that "Gay marriage supporters ask U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:13 pm
The separate interviews are now standard procedure at USCIS Boston and Lawrence District Offices for all marriage-based green card adjustment of status cases. [read post]
The separate interviews are now standard procedure at USCIS Boston and Lawrence District Offices for all marriage-based green card adjustment of status cases. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 It took the high court 17-years to reverse the dubious Bowers decision in the seminal 2003 case of Lawrence v Texas, which expressly overruled their prior decision as defining the liberty and privacy interests of two consenting adults too narrowly to survive a Due Process analysis.There is also a notion that gay-marriage was removed via the ballot box and that's where the battle should be won. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 It took the high court 17-years to reverse the dubious Bowers decision in the seminal 2003 case of Lawrence v Texas, which expressly overruled their prior decision as defining the liberty and privacy interests of two consenting adults too narrowly to survive a Due Process analysis.There is also a notion that gay-marriage was removed via the ballot box and that's where the battle should be won. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Both opponents and proponents of same-sex marriage assumed that if Hawaii legalized same-sex marriage, then couples from all over the country would marry there and then seek recognition of their marriages at home. [read post]