Search for: "MARTINEZ V. HIGH"
Results 61 - 80
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am
In Illinois v Wardlow (528 US 119 [2000]), the United States Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, held that a person in a high crime area fleeing at the sight of police is, by itself, sufficient to create reasonable suspicion, under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:35 am
Martinez v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 4:09 am
Even as amplified by the plaintiff’s affidavit and supporting evidence, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83), the complaint failed to allege that the defendants acted “with intent to deceive the court or any party” (Judiciary Law § 487[1]; see Fleyshman v Suckle & Schlesinger, PLLC, 91 AD3d 591, 592-593; Jaroslawicz v Cohen, 12 AD3d 160, 160-161). [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:08 am
Martinez, No. 08-1371. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:33 am
" Yesterday, the California Supreme Court ruled, in Martinez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 2:08 pm
On January 12, the Supreme Court in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 12:50 pm
In Glenn v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Dimas-Martinez v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:47 pm
Martinez. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
In Martinez v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:29 pm
The recent Supreme Court ruling referenced in the article is Martinez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:29 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Martinez testified that the MVD tracking process reflects that this likelihood of no insurance is ninety percent or greater.State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 5:43 am
Fla.) in U.S. v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:55 am
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court subsequently decided two cases, Martinez v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:02 pm
The Supreme Court subsequently held, in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
(Martinez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am
I blogged two weeks ago about Hansen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:26 am
The high court's decision to let this execution proceed bodes well for the State of Arizona's position in the pending case on ineffective assistance of counsel on state collateral review, Martinez v. [read post]
