Search for: "MATTER OF B J" Results 61 - 80 of 5,742
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2015, 11:10 am by Stephen Bilkis
As a threshold matter, the petitioner, Forestdale, Inc., established that it made diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship between the appellant and the subject child by, inter alia, scheduling weekly visitation and by providing referrals to parenting skills classes and anger management counseling (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [f]; Matter of Jamie M., 63 NY2d 388 [1984]). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:53 am by Guest Author
But the context of the entire FTC Act means it should not matter whether the Negative Implication Canon applies. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 1:43 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 08-0215, 2009 MT 245, B.J. and J.J., Individually and on behalf of E.J., a minor, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
How did the Legal Board decide this matter? [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:28 am by PJ Blount
Masson-Zwaan (Leiden University, The Netherlands); J. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am by Ron Coleman
” Restatement (Second) of Judgments §28, Comment j, at 283–284. [read post]