Search for: "MATTER OF CASE v. State Ins. Fund" Results 61 - 80 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In this setting, states and cities argue that the anti-commandeering principle prevents the feds from requiring state and local authorities to affirmatively provide information about or access to individuals who may have committed immigration law violations.Perhaps the most important Supreme Court case on this point is Printz v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:28 am
Co.(1st Dept., decided 6/10/2008)This is a DJ action regarding the relative insurance coverage responsibilities of several insurers for a $2.4 million dollar settlement (presumably funded by National Union) in an underlying case. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, the documentary evidence submitted by Leavitt in support his motion utterly refuted the plaintiffs’ factual allegations, and conclusively established a defense as a matter of law (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, for all the above stated reasons it is hereby ORDERED, that the motion of INES GASSMANN and the cross-motions of MICHAEL O'SULLIVAN, CHARLES PEKNIC, MARTIN A. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:48 am by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
In an exciting win for Florida personal injury plaintiffs and their physicians, the state’s Supreme Court issued a recent landmark decision in the case of Worley v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:48 am by Michael K. Grife, Esq.
In an exciting win for Florida personal injury plaintiffs and their physicians, the state’s Supreme Court issued a recent landmark decision in the case of Worley v. [read post]