Search for: "MATTER OF CONNELL v STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2010, 4:26 pm
Thomas O'Connell - Judge Holland - United States - Verla Sue Holland - United States Supreme Court [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:15 pm by Ronald Mann
But I think there is something fundamentally different about suits involving the government because … any suit against the government is a matter only of largesse and the government’s voluntary choice. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
By Mike Dorf In a very interesting opinion last week in Byrd v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Triumph and Span signed a "Preliminary Agreement" which stated that Triumph would incorporate the terms of the preliminary agreement into the partnership documents. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:33 am
Reviewing the findings of the Appellate Division, we see: "A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 may be established "either by the defendant's alleged deceit or by an alleged chronic, extreme pattern of legal delinquency by the defendant" (emphasis supplied) (Knecht v Tusa, 15 AD3d 626, 627 [2005]; see O'Connell v Kerson, 291 AD2d 386, 387 [2002]; see also Bridges v 725 Riverside Dr., 119 AD2d 789 [1986]; Trepel… [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
  Not hardly.Not a single state’s high court (or any other court, for that matter) has followed Karl down the path to perdition. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:16 am by Todd Henderson
” Katyal argued that this is a matter of state law and prerogative, and that federal law should have nothing to say on the matter. [read post]