Search for: "MATTER OF H D"
Results 61 - 80
of 3,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
District Court Judge William H. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 7:49 am
…[H]arassment occurs when a protagonist knowingly causes his victim to suffer undue distress. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
” 42 U.S.C. 7607(d)(8)-(9). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
” To Brandeis, the only thing that mattered was Butler’s “views as to property. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Moreover, even if Colorado’s intent were to try to impose a condition on Trump’s service, obviously that condition would be that he not be Section-3-disqualified to serve on January 20, 2025, rather than that (as Mitchell would have it) that he’d be disqualified from taking office as of March 5, 2024 (the date of the Colorado primary). [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
§ 15A-1340.16F(d). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(d) If the notice is faulty in any way, the court can use any error in the notice as a reason to deny relocation and even punish the would-be-relocator with a sanction. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
.'" As a matter of advocacy, lawyers should always be willing to acknowledge, if pressed, weaknesses in a position. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
The federal H-2B visa program permits U.S. employers to temporarily hire nonimmigrants to perform nonagricultural labor or services. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
A newly announced religious discrimination settlement reminds employers of the advisability of reviewing and strengthening the defensibility of their grooming, dress code, scheduling and time off and other employment policies, practices and other procedures for applying, granting or denying religious exceptions, and other employment practices to defend against potential discrimination exposures in light of rising religious sensitivities, the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
” In support of this very broad proposition, the CRSCC cites In re Griffin, in which Chief Justice Chase, sitting by designation, wrote that the disability “create[d]” by Section 3 is “to be made operative … by the legislation of congress in its ordinary course. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
§ 9-11-56(h) into motion, yet commits a procedural default fatal to his appeal, is foreclosed from thereafter resubmitting the matter for review on appeal of the final judgment. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
However, the DoD Manual stops short of embracing any of these possibilities as a matter of binding law, and instead opts for a more pragmatic, discretionary approach. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
2d 314, 320 (D. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:19 pm
About the Author Recognized by her peers as a Martindale-Hubble “AV-Preeminent” (Top 1%) and “Top Rated Lawyer” with special recognition LexisNexis® Martindale-Hubbell® as “LEGAL LEADER Texas Top Rated Lawyer” in Health Care Law and Labor and Employment Law; as among the “Best Lawyers In Dallas” for her work in the fields of “Labor & Employment,” “Tax: ERISA & Employee Benefits,” “Health Care” and… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm
As a threshold matter, for those less familiar with Section 533, a brief overview may be useful. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
It is then a matter of describing those rights to give them form. [read post]
