Search for: "MATTER OF M W" Results 61 - 80 of 3,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 6:05 pm by Mark Ashton
Father filed and secured an order to prevent any move until the matter was tried. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
TM is a terrible subject matter for ex parte proceedings. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
I’m going to start by going back to some earlier cases, Two Pesos v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(I:342–44) In fact, Wilson’s deeply anti-Semitic outside adviser Colonel Edward M. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
As a general matter, dealers are expected to act in their own interest, free to buy and sell on their own account, often on behalf of artists, collectors or galleries.[8] Agents, however, act on behalf of the person they are representing—their principal. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm by Marty Lederman
 This post and the next are follow-ups to my collection of posts on Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm by Veronica Paulino
No matter what your next move will be, you need to know your value, have confidence, and do not shy away from asking for that salary increase meeting. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:11 am by Andrew Weissmann
The press incorrectly and repeatedly blast out that the Hur report found Biden willfully retained classified documents, in other words, that Biden committed a felony; with some in the news media further trumpeting that the Special Counsel decided only as a matter of discretion not to recommend charges. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on… [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
S&M cases are fascinating in thinking about consent and criminality. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: What I’m taking issue with is that assumption! [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]