Search for: "MATTER OF R A D J D"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,938
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
Pix Credit here My Administration places the highest urgency on governing the development and use of AI safely and responsibly, and is therefore advancing a coordinated, Federal Government-wide approach to doing so. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Lawyers may receive non-monetary compensation for their services, such as an ownership stake in a business venture, provided that this arrangement doesn’t involve acquiring a proprietary interest in the legal case or subject matter of the litigation.[7] However, despite the obvious benefits, accepting artwork for payment can get into the weeds of legal ethics, raising complex issues related to valuation, potential conflicts of interest, and disclosure requirements. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
After 2020, the Black Lives Matter movement and heightened awareness of systemic racism have amplified these voices and led to renewed calls for removal. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am
J. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
I’d like to start by returning to a theme that I’ve touched on before, and that is how public trust in our institutions is faltering.[1] No sector is immune from this trend. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
Nealon, J.), aff’d, 105 A.3d 788 (Pa. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Although better than the proposed rule,[1] the final beneficial ownership reporting rule continues to rest on flawed economics. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:46 pm
Levine and Christopher J. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
All allocation policies are unequal and as observed by Garnham J in R v XC Southwark (2017) EWHC 736 (Admin): “Every tweak to the scheme to benefit one individual or one class of applicant is likely to have an adverse effect on another…”. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
The pain, the fear, and the sense of déjà vu during the recent catastrophe were excruciatingly tormenting. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 3:11 am
Murphy J. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:21 am
It is clear that ‘parody’, ‘caricature’ and ‘pastiche’ are ways through which one’s own freedom of expression and information may be exercised by specifically entering into a ‘dialogue’ with an earlier work or protected subject-matter and/or the ideas conveyed therein.Such an understanding is also reflected in a recent decision of the Italian Supreme Court [commented here]. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Kim, Tanya R. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
74-80 Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Campuzano Díaz, Beatriz “The participation of the… [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am
” Jefferson County v Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 447 (1999) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:23 am
Ryan J. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
