Search for: "MATTER OF R P S"
Results 61 - 80
of 6,734
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2024, 1:59 pm
Nonetheless, on Mar. 8, Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) and The Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway tried to resuscitate the claim. [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 6:42 pm
Gjennom ulike systemer for porteføljeovervåkning fanger rådet hvert år opp hundrevis av nyhetsoppslag om selskaper i fondet som er knyttet til normbrudd som kan falle inn under retningslinjene. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:26 am
R. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm
Moreover, while X’s Tunisian nationality appears to be undisputed, there may surprisingly be some doubts about Y’s Tunisian nationality, as emerged later in the parties’ arguments before the Joint Chambers. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
-P. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm
R. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:44 am
The court’s ruling is significant validation of our position. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:06 am
R. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Toronto: LexisNexis Canada, 2022. xxix, 552 p. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
R. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:59 am
R. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Cunningham & Ute Römer-Barron, Four Reasons the Supreme Court Should Reconsider Its Article III Standing Doctrine, (Forthcoming, Ohio State Law Journal Online, v. 85, 2024).Elias Neibart, M.A. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 8:58 am
The Court of Appeal considered Aweys and R v Brent London Borough Council, ex p. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
(R-2). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am
Department of Defense’s (DoD) Law of War Manual, first published in 2015, sets out the DoD’s authoritative interpretation of international law on matters relating to armed conflict. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:48 pm
Similarly, Mathias Reimann describes it as “intimate” (M Reimann, “Comparative Law and Private International Law”, in M Reimann and R Zimmermann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (2nd ed., OUP, 2019) p. 1340). [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Guns ‘R Us is ok, but sexual expression is riskier. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm
Simply put, the fee increase is intended to reflect USCIS’s increased case processing costs and to ensure that no services have to be cut (and processing times increased). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
In Matter of F-P-R- , 24 I&N Dec. 681 (BIA 2008) , for example, the BIA declined to follow the Second Circuit’s decision in Joaquin-Porras v. [read post]
