Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 61 - 80
of 53,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Furthermore, they submitted that, judging from the various activities of the [patent proprietor] in other patent matters, the [patent proprietor] was obviously not prevented by the explosion in dealing with those matters. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 6:33 pm
The R. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:12 am
ORBITZ SNUBS MEDIA MATTERS: Well, Media Matters doesn’t drive any traffic, as far as I can tell. [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:00 am
Launch Locations Matters Interactive Web Tool [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:01 pm
Thus the proceedings were to be continued with the liquidator as party as of right (kraft Amtes) (see also T 917/01).The arguments brought forward in favour of a suspension of the proceedings in analogous application of R 84(2) did not persuade the Board. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:52 pm
An anonymous email correspondent has asked why I don't post on environmental matters. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The decision contains an interesting paragraph dealing with the emotional style of the petition, and possible consequences as to its admissibility.[4] It appears to the EBA that the petition was filed within two months of notification of the decision in question, that the petitioner was adversely affected thereby, that the prescribed fee has been paid in time, and that the petition complies with R 107(1)(b).[5] As regards R 106, the EBA notes that the petitioner argued, as regards… [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm
However, as the present factual situation is different, decision T 610/95 is not suitable for justifying the dismissal of auxiliary request I based on R 80.Even considering said decisions the Board is of the opinion that auxiliary request I complies with the requirements of R 80. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
However, decision J 27/96 is concerned with R 88 EPC 1973 (R 139 EPC 2000), which applies to corrections of errors in documents filed before the EPO, whereas the [opponent] is objecting to a decision concerning a correction under R 140 EPC 2000 (R 89 EPC 1973), which applies to decisions of deciding bodies of the EPO. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
By virtue of A 111(1) and R 100(1), these provisions are also applicable mutatis mutandis to appeal proceedings. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:17 am
Why don’t people trust lawyers and does it really matter? [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
It doesn't matter that you never knew the victim. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:38 am
If you do, your fees won’t matter. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 11:01 am
T 283/88 [4]). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:32 am
Based on some recent polling, neither Americans in general, nor various scholars, think the TPP or TTIP matters much, at least to them personally: and: [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:02 pm
Therefore, the appeal complies formally with the requirements of A 108, third sentence, and R 99(2). [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 8:14 pm
REMEMBER: MEDIA MATTERS IS "NON POLITICAL. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
The ED denied the novelty of the subject-matter of claim 1 over the disclosure in document D1, a document relevant under A 54(3). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The Board then stated:[4] In summary, the board finds that claim 1 of both requests relates to the technical implementation of excluded matter in the form of game rules. [read post]
