Search for: "MATTER OF SAYLOR" Results 61 - 80 of 112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
It remains to be seen how the COVID-19 pandemic will influence jury awards.Stay of Civil Litigation Matters Pending Result of Criminal CaseIn a case of first impression handed down in March in the matter of Keesee v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:02 pm by Evan M. Levow
A concurring opinion by Justice Thomas Saylor portrayed vehicular homicide as a matter of strict liability that only requires proof of a DUI conviction and a death resulting from that offense. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:37 am by Benjamin E. Leace
The majority opinion, written by Justice Saylor, acknowledged that courts applying Pennsylvania law have frequently wrestled with the scope of the attorney-client privilege. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 1:57 pm by Mark Ashton
Granville, determined that because this was an interference with parental custodial rights deemed fundamental as a matter of law, the statute conferring these rights was subject to strict scrutiny. 530 U.S. 57,65. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 6:15 am
So Bexis could argue that, no matter what standard the court used, the defendant should win. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
 If the case makes it beyond this threshold finding, the matter will be permitted to proceed to the jury for a determination as to whether a product’s design was defective and the cause of the injury alleged. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
In Spotz itself, the majority refers to the prosecutorial misconduct claim as “frivolous,” 2011 WL 1601629 at *21, but Justice Saylor rejected such a characterization of the claim, id. at *87 (Saylor, J., concurring). [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
In Spotz itself, the majority refers to the prosecutorial misconduct claim as “frivolous,” 2011 WL 1601629 at *21, but Justice Saylor rejected such a characterization of the claim, id. at *87 (Saylor, J., concurring). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The Majority Opinion written by Justice Baer can be reviewed HERE.Chief Justice Saylor's Concurring Opinion can be viewed HERE.Justice Wecht's Concurring Opinion can be viewed HERE.2. [read post]
9 May 2007, 10:25 pm
Saylor, 2007 SCC 18, a father contributed the funds to joint account with one of his daughters. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 6:25 pm by Ilya Somin
As discussed in my earlier post, I think the correct interpretation of Takings Clause would require compensation in at least some of these cases, and that compensation for owners of shut down businesses and other enterprises is often required as a matter of morality and policy, even if it is not dictated by the Constitution. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:16 am by Rick St. Hilaire
”And Glenn Saylor, Jr. wrote:“I am against import restrictions of Cypriot coins into the United States. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 1:49 pm
The pay raise decision: who do you think got it right, Justice Castille or Justice Saylor? [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Bexis
  Perhaps the defendant in Beard preserved the issue, we don’t know, but that didn't matter since the defense cross-petition for alloca [read post]