Search for: "MATTER OF SIMON v. Power" Results 61 - 80 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Simon LazarusNo less than the Trump administration, Supreme Court pundits felt blind-sided by Chief Justice John Roberts’ rejection, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 8:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Trump's power to perform her obligations by refraining from publishing the book without the consent of the proponents. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:48 pm
These are the articles from September: International: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XLIV Concludes with Adoption of Several New Measures, Decisions, and Resolutions United Kingdom: Intellectual Property Office Rules Artificial Intelligence Cannot Patent Inventions Israel: Supreme Court Rules Israeli Courts May Void or Change Choice of Law Provisions in Standard Contracts Between Global Companies and Small Businesses Japan: Children and Family Agency Establishment Act Adopted Egypt:… [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Compare attractiveness of Simon Tam’s claim v. that of the Washington football team. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by Michael Gibbs
  Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Ryan Anderson
As the four dissenting opinions make abundantly clear, today’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am by charonqc
Shine Eye Gal. and Malbeck Simon Myerson QC says VOTE – I couldn’t agree more…. he writes: “Vote. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
Leonard Simon of San Diego will argue for the respondents. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 10:49 am by Daniel Shaviro
As long as I am writing blog entries that mention Supreme Court litigation, perhaps I ought to mention the pending case of PPL Corporation v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
Simon Malynicz QC began by setting out the approaches adopted by Arnold J in the High Court and Kitchin LJ, noting that while both undertook a survey of the ancient powers of the Court of Chancery to grant injunctive remedies, whereas Arnold J maintained a clear distinction between domestic and EU law, Kitchin LJ’s judgment involved blending the two together in arriving at his “principled basis” for making website blocking injunctions against ISPs who are aware… [read post]