Search for: "MATTER OF T J F"
Results 61 - 80
of 2,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
The Federal Court declined to exercise its jurisdiction in the matter; this was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Meow Media, Inc., 300 F.3d 683, 696-97 (6th Cir. 2002). [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:56 pm
(All adjudicators except Madam Justice Côté applied a reasonableness standard; Côté J. concurred in the result, but would have applied a correctness standard.) [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
But Judge J. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
I don't think there is a good rationale. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
App. 506, 512, 500 S.E.2d 112, 116 (1998) (Greene, J., concurring in result, joined by Timmons-Goodson, J.). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
Solomon, 90 F.4th 198 (Jan. 3, 2024). [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 12:30 am
At the time, T 0844/18 was considered the end of the road for the patent. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
We don’t know, partly because we don’t have a neat consensus model of the optimal tradeoffs. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
He did not necessarily defend the case as being correct as an original matter, but rather explained that Griffin's Case settled the matter. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am
If adopted in its current form, the proposed treaty would increase the risk that good faith security researchers could face prosecution, even when our goal is to enhance technological safety and educate the public on cybersecurity matters. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm
Judd, 471 F. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
Trump offers two types of arguments about why Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t disqualify him from holding office. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Donald J. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
The respondent also briefly invokes separation of powers concerns, namely, the legislative supremacy argument that “[i]t is the role of Congress, not the courts or an agency, to write the laws and prescribe the circumstances under which the government may impose criminal penalties. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
That seems unlikely, but it doesn’t mean there isn’t anything there. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[5] Finally, the Commission’s mandatory language states that “[i]f Defendant breaches this agreement, the Commission may petition the Court to vacate the Final Judgment and restore this action to its active docket. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Sotomayor and J. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Mackey, 652 F. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Eighth Circuit (over a dissent): Doesn't matter. [read post]
