Search for: "MCLAREN MACOMB" Results 61 - 80 of 85
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2023, 12:44 pm by Erin Shaughnessy
   The Board’s opinion addresses the use of severance agreements by McLaren Macomb, a Michigan hospital that was forced to permanently furlough 11 employees in response to COVID-19. [read post]
At issue in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (Feb. 21, 2023), were the legality of certain provisions contained in form severance agreements proffered to 11 furloughed bargaining unit members (in addition to various ULP allegations). [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:20 am
In McLaren Macomb, the NLRB overturned two decisions that had permitted employers to include confidentiality and nondisparagement provisions in severance agreements. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:33 am
On February 21, 2023, the NLRB issued its opinion in McLaren Macomb and corresponding press release, Board Rules that Employers May Not Offer Severance Agreements Requiring Employees to Broadly Waive Labor Law Rights.The case involved the following provisions in separation agreements offered to 11 permanently furloughed bargaining unit employees:6. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by Daniel Schwartz
Last week, the NLRB issued a landmark decision in McLaren Macomb that is already shaking up how private employers (both unionized and non-unionized) should consider severance agreements. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm by Susan Gross Sholinsky
Thus, the McLaren Macomb decision applies to employees at non-unionized workplaces who fall within the Act’s statutory definition of an “employee. [read post]
On February 21, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board issued a landmark decision in McLaren Macomb that has the potential to seismically change how employers approach and manage employee separations that include severance packages. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 8:30 am by Chris Sutton
” The McLaren Macomb decision is applicable to both union and non-union workplaces. [read post]
The Board’s decision in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023) concerned a Michigan hospital that, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, permanently furloughed 11 nonessential union employees following the issuance of government regulations prohibiting the hospital from performing elective and outpatient procedures and from allowing nonessential employees to work inside the hospital. [read post]
The issue presented in McLaren Macomb was whether the severance agreement that the respondent-employer offered to 11 employees violated the NLRA. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:31 am by admin
” On February 21, 2023, the NLRB issued a decision in McLaren Macomb,1 applying Section 7 and finding that the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA by including confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions in severance agreements offered to a group of furloughed workers.2 The severance agreement at issue contained the following provisions: Confidentiality Agreement. [read post]
The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued a ruling on February 21, 2023, in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), which in effect finds broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”). [read post]
The National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) issued a ruling on February 21, 2023, in McLaren Macomb, 372 NLRB No. 58 (2023), which in effect finds broad confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses in severance agreements violate Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (“Act”). [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) issued a decision on February 21 in McLaren Macomb (372 NLRB No. 58) overruling precedent to hold that employers may not offer employees severance agreements containing confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) issued a decision on February 21 in McLaren Macomb (372 NLRB No. 58) overruling precedent to hold that employers may not offer employees severance agreements containing confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) issued a decision on February 21 in McLaren Macomb (372 NLRB No. 58) overruling precedent to hold that employers may not offer employees severance agreements containing confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) issued a decision on February 21 in McLaren Macomb (372 NLRB No. 58) overruling precedent to hold that employers may not offer employees severance agreements containing confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 10:00 pm
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board) issued a decision on February 21 in McLaren Macomb (372 NLRB No. 58) overruling precedent to hold that employers may not offer employees severance agreements containing confidentiality or non-disparagement provisions. [read post]