Search for: "MEANS v. VERNON" Results 61 - 80 of 207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As claimant's contentions constitute a failure to hire claim, they are unavailing; Civil Service Law § 58 (1) (a) falls squarely within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA (see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d at 184; Petrelli v City of Mount Vernon, 9 F3d 250, 253 [2nd Cir 1993]; Ruderman v Police Dept. of City of New York, 857 F Supp 326, 329 [SD NY 1994]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:02 pm by Public Employment Law Press
As claimant's contentions constitute a failure to hire claim, they are unavailing; Civil Service Law § 58 (1) (a) falls squarely within the law enforcement exception of the ADEA (see Feldman v Nassau County, 434 F3d at 184; Petrelli v City of Mount Vernon, 9 F3d 250, 253 [2nd Cir 1993]; Ruderman v Police Dept. of City of New York, 857 F Supp 326, 329 [SD NY 1994]). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appellate Division annulled the hearing officer's determination and granted Petitioner's application for benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c, opining that the hearing officer's determination was not supported by substantial evidence Explaining that "Judicial review of the subject determination is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence" and, citing Matter of Solano v City of Mount Vernon, 108 AD3d 676,… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appellate Division annulled the hearing officer's determination and granted Petitioner's application for benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c, opining that the hearing officer's determination was not supported by substantial evidence Explaining that "Judicial review of the subject determination is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence" and, citing Matter of Solano v City of Mount Vernon, 108 AD3d 676,… [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:17 am by Michael Lowe
(c) In this section: (1) “Child” means a person younger than 17 years of age who is not the spouse of the actor. (2) “Spouse” means a person who is legally married to another. (3) “Health care services provider” means: (A) a physician licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Article 4495b, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes); (B) a chiropractor licensed under Chapter 94, Acts of the 51st Legislature, Regular Session, 1949… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am by Maria Kendrick
This is because the judges have not adjudicated on the referendum result, just who takes the decision to start the process and effectively decide what ‘Leave’ means, as this was not defined by consensus between parties to the Leave campaign prior to the referendum vote. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
   The Court of Appeals began its opinion by explaining how, and why, the prosecution arose:In 2008, V., born February 1, 1998, and her two younger siblings lived with their mother's uncle and his wifein Mount Vernon, Washington. [read post]