Search for: "MITCHELL v. SAMUELS"
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
At that time, four justices – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh – noted that they concurred in the decision to deny review because the factual record was too undeveloped to grant preliminary relief to the coach, emphasizing that they did not “necessarily agree with the decision (much less the opinion) below. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:37 pm
This Stat Pack would not have been possible without the help of James Romoser, Angie Gou and Mitchell Jagodinski. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
For in Miller v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm
, Best v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Antkowiak (Seattle), Samuel P. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned the convictions of 16 members of the Bergholz Old Order Amish community in Ohio under the 2009 federal hate-crimes law, even though it was undisputed that over a three-month period in 2011, the assailants--under the direction and approval of the Bishop of the Bergholz community, Samuel Mullett--attacked nine other Amish individuals by forcibly slicing off the men’s beards and cutting the women’s hair. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
As the Supreme Court itself quoted Samuel Johnson, “No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
King v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Mitchell L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Mitchell L. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
James Room)Panel 3: The Disciplinary State, 2:00-3:30Chair: Erin Braatz, Suffolk University Law School (ebraatz@suffolk.edu)Commentator: Lauren Benton, Vanderbilt University (lauren.benton@vanderbilt.edu)Stacey Hynd, University of Exeter (s.hynd@exeter.ac.uk) (Re-)Constructing Murder: Capital Punishment and the Criminalization of African Bodies in Colonial Ghana, c. 1890-1957Dior Konate, South Carolina State University (dkonate@scsu.edu) Imprisonment and Citizenship in Senegal, 1917-1946… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
[v] At about the same time as I was largely being condemned, I offered, via twitter, to provide a respectful substantive critique of the Response if the LCWA would publish it in full on their web site. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
Matthews Evangelical Lutheran Church of Unaltered Augsburg Confes, 43 MITCHELL HAMLINE L. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Samuel W. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Texas, Collens v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Two others Justices, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh have called themselves originalists and are receptive to originalist arguments, although seem to be open to arguments that precedent should prevail over original meaning, at least in some categories of cases. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
