Search for: "MITCHELL v. SAMUELS"
Results 61 - 80
of 88
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2015, 2:54 pm
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:22 am
On February 24, 2015, in Brewer v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned the convictions of 16 members of the Bergholz Old Order Amish community in Ohio under the 2009 federal hate-crimes law, even though it was undisputed that over a three-month period in 2011, the assailants--under the direction and approval of the Bishop of the Bergholz community, Samuel Mullett--attacked nine other Amish individuals by forcibly slicing off the men’s beards and cutting the women’s hair. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
Mitchell. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:35 am
Mitchell, put that argument before the Court. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:51 pm
As the Supreme Court itself quoted Samuel Johnson, “No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:43 am
For in Miller v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Mitchell L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Mitchell L. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW / SAMUEL M. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW / SAMUEL M. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Samuel Brenner, ed. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
The current Supreme Court has at least two members who seem strongly influenced by originalist constitutional theory--Associate Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas and two others, John Roberts and Samuel Alito who may also be receptive to originalist arguments. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:15 am
Mitchell will host a free webinar on the decision this Wednesday. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Antkowiak (Seattle), Samuel P. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:36 pm
Samuel W. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
Geller
"Mitchell J. [read post]
