Search for: "Malcolm v. Little" Results 61 - 80 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2013, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
            Both these accounts have relatively little to say about Hirschman’s third category—loyalty. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
  At a minimum, a 90-minute documentary, even though a bitingly critical attack on  a specific candidate, leaving little doubt of what it wanted voters to do,  may wind up with constitutional protection, it appeared after the Court had heard Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:40 am by Ronald Mann
The justices finished up the first week of the new term by finally hearing argument in Google v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Weatherup [2017] QCA 70 the Queensland Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the “Australian” newspaper in a defamation case involving former Townsville Bulletin journalist Malcolm Weatherup. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:43 pm by Ronald Mann
There is a recent case (Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,) in which the justices adopted a broad rule of exhaustion under copyright law, but that case affords little guidance because the Copyright Act, unlike the Patent Act, codifies the exhaustion doctrine. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:42 pm by Mark Walsh
” She adds that if that all sounds a little abstract, “some examples should make the point. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am by Mark Walsh
The court also heard arguments that day and the next day (for a little case called June Medical Services v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am by Stephen Page
In a decision akin to that delived by the Court of Appeal, a Queensland Magistrate has helped set out the test for domestic violence cases under that State's Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 1:34 pm by Nedim Malovic
Since the C-Type’s creator, automotive aerodynamist Malcolm Sayer (1916-1970) and his contemporaries are no longer alive, the court had to evaluate the evidence invoked by the parties as to whether the C-Type qualified for protection.With reference to C-833/18, Brompton Bicycle [Katpost here], the court found that the practical constraints put on Sayer by for example the need to design a car to win the Le Mans, while adhering to a distinctly Jaguar style, did not limit Sayer to… [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]