Search for: "Man v. Barr"
Results 61 - 80
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2012, 5:30 am
: "'Roseanne' Redux as John Goodman Signs on for Barr's New Pilot" pjblack.me/zchnzl this is cool: "Foursquare Adds NFC Support To Its Android App" pjblack.me/AB1YSM can a man be "slut-shamed"? [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:09 am
With the grant in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:45 am
In the first nonplatonic 2-woman kiss the women were electrifying: Sharon Stone Mariel Hemingway and Rosanne Barr. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm
Sanford, Plessy v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
Barr, No. 1:20-cv-03553, 2020 WL 12674163 (D.D.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:53 am
Barr challenging the changes to asylum regulations that allow the ACAs — also known as “safe third country” agreements — to go into effect. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:53 am
Barr challenging the changes to asylum regulations that allow the ACAs — also known as “safe third country” agreements — to go into effect. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Reed v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:28 am
I try my hand at explaining the DC Circuit's Net Neutrality ruling in Mozilla v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
U.T. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
U.T. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Patent Circle) India: ‘In transit’ drug seizures and TRIPS: UK decision may help Indian companies (Spicy IP) India: Public interest litigation to prevent GM seeds in India (IP Osgoode) Isle of Man: SPCs on the Isle of Man (The SPC Blog) US: Board decision in Ex Parte Roberts doesn’t make the cut (Patents4Life) US: Are you getting all the patent term you should? [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
The old man will probably be compiling the cases alone on Monday. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 11:57 am
Waters[11] upheld the conviction of a New York man who had been admitted to a mental health unit solely upon the evaluation of two physicians. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Project Veritas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
And all of this is simply a precursor to the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
Barr Laboratories, Inc., 397 F. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:30 pm
EgyptNaguib Gabriel and others v. [read post]
