Search for: "Mann v State of New York" Results 61 - 80 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse uses the upcoming “Persons Day” in Canada, commemorating the day in 1929 when a court ruled that women were indeed “persons” for purposes of Canada’s basic law, and therefore eligible for appointment to the Canadian senate, as a jumping-off point to discuss originalism in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of Wednesday’s argument in Taggart v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:06 am by Amy Howe
Ronald Mann previews today’s second oral argument, in the bankruptcy case Law v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Booth.In the New York Times: Jane Manners and Lev Menand (both fellows at Columbia Law School) draw on history to discuss whether the Supreme Court will protect agencies from Trump’s reach. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:10 pm by Rick Hills
Susan Jacoby's op-ed piece in today's New York Times beautifully illustrates how not to attack local control of education. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
Ronald Mann reports on Tuesday’s arguments in Freeman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the lower court's action.The court, citing Mann v Abel, 10 NY3d 271, explained that a defamatory statement constituting "pure opinion" is not actionable under New York State Law because expressions of opinion, in contrast to assertions of fact, are deemed privileged and, no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action for defamation.Here, however, the Appellate Division observed that although the… [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division sustained the lower court's action.The court, citing Mann v Abel, 10 NY3d 271, explained that a defamatory statement constituting "pure opinion" is not actionable under New York State Law because expressions of opinion, in contrast to assertions of fact, are deemed privileged and, no matter how offensive, cannot be the subject of an action for defamation.Here, however, the Appellate Division observed that although the… [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc. v Ruvoldt  2017 NY Slip Op 31232(U)  June 8, 2017  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 158764/2015  Judge: Jeffrey K. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The New York Times has published an article on Facebook’s efforts to curate content posted by users, alleging a lack of sufficient guidelines. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:35 am by Edith Roberts
For The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that Monday’s other argument, in Ayestas v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times, with commentary from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences (who also weighs in on the ruling in Taylor v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” Ronald Mann analyzes Monday’s argument in McGirt v. [read post]