Search for: "Mann v. Good"
Results 61 - 80
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Last Week in the Courts The Mirror Group phone hacking trial, Various Claimants v MGN, began before Mann J on 2 March 2015 and continued through to 6 March 2015. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
(Ronald Mann covered the decision for this blog.) [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:50 am
Its social network has vastly more users than Google+ (800 million v 62 million, but even larger lead in active users), and, in most respects, more social functionality. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 10:53 am
Mann Category: Product #: Regular price:$ (Sale ends !) [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
I can’t think of a good excuse for MacLean not checking into this before falsely claiming that Manne only hired white men. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 9:36 am
It was submitted that MGN could not make good the point that the judge had to pay close regard to personal injury awards. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 11:53 am
And it's not a good one. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:39 am
The BBC disputes his claims, and says its coverage of the search of the apartment in Sunningdale, Berkshire, was accurate and in good faith. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:05 am
In Vlaming v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:59 am
Mann v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:59 am
Mann v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 6:02 am
The first and third questionsIn terms of assessing ‘genuine use’, the CJEU first noted that, according to Ansul BV v Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (C–40/01), the fact that a mark is not used for goods newly available on the market but rather for goods that were sold in the past does not mean that its use is not genuine. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:43 pm
Per Efaw v. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
tend not to go far (recall how exciting Klein v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:16 am
Mann Hosp., L.L.C., 996 F.3d 269 (5th Cir. 2021), the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Laufer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Golub v Enquirer/Star Group, 89 NY2d 1074, the court opined that "Generally, a written statement may be defamatory 'if it tends to expose a person to hatred, contempt or aversion, or to induce an evil or unsavory opinion of him in the minds of a substantial number of the community'", quoting Mencher v Chesley, 297 NY 94. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Golub v Enquirer/Star Group, 89 NY2d 1074, the court opined that "Generally, a written statement may be defamatory 'if it tends to expose a person to hatred, contempt or aversion, or to induce an evil or unsavory opinion of him in the minds of a substantial number of the community'", quoting Mencher v Chesley, 297 NY 94. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:07 am
" Mann, 161 S.W.3d at 834. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
The biggest media legal story of the week was the Mirror Phone Hacking judgment handed down by Mr Justice Mann on 21 May 2015. [read post]
