Search for: "Manning v. Hobbs" Results 61 - 80 of 118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
The facts should make us all feel good about our fellow man. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am by admin
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
“[A] man of high ambitions … must face the loneliness of original work. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Hobbs, 574 U.S. 352, 360–61 (2015), or compelling them to engage in behavior that "violates their religious beliefs," e.g., Burwell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am by Kedar Bhatia
§ 1951 (a)(the Hobbs Act) and 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Given the terms of his sentence, never will Defendant be a truly free man again. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:00 pm
I recall being enraptured by Griswold v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:27 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Court also did not act on a major test of prosecutors’ use of race to try to persuade a jury in a murder case to impose a death sentence on a black man (Buck v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 10:58 am by Robert Laplaca
  For instance, “in 1522, a Venetian man was condemned to death after tampering with the prize draw for 1,500 ducats, a parcel of silk, and a live wild cat. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am by Lyle Denniston
Hobbs (10-9647); the Court granted review of the two separately, but said that it will hear oral arguments in them back-to-back. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Baylor, No. 07-3002 Defendant's convictions for interfering with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, and using a firearm in relation to a crime of violence are affirmed over meritless claims that: 1) the requirement of a de minimis effect on interstate commerce under the Hobbs Act is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court's decision in US v. [read post]